Background |
![]() |
![]() |
Relevance of Fish ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]()
If you want to read more (in German), please check: ARLINGHAUS, R. 2004. Angelfischerei in Deutschland: eine soziale und ökonomische Analyse. Berichte des IGB 18:1-160. Download.
![]()
A very common management tool used by anglers is fish stocking. Fish stocking describes the process of introducing cultivated or wild fish into different water bodies to support the existing fish stock or to reintroduce fish species. By this means people try to compensate for a lack of natural reproduction, to maintain or improve the angling potential of the fishery or to reintroduce species. In Germany the planning and implementation of fish stocking is mostly done by angling clubs (employees as well as volunteers). These clubs are supposed to have a large interest on sustainable practices. Thanks to their remarkable involvement they have managed to save many species and to compensate for a range of harmful influences that have their origin outside of fisheries. A systematic evaluation of fish stocking as a management practice is currently lacking. More and more hints show, that fish stocking should not be taken as a panacea. There might be unforeseeable consequences for the water ecosystems and the genetics of fish populations.
Fish stocking has a long tradition and involves high costs and a great deal effort from the angling clubs. The debates about the potential positive and negative impacts are quite diverse. On the one hand, humans have changed many water bodies irreversibly, so that fish stocking for the support of species can be seen as sustainable. On the other hand the natural adaptation potential of wild fish could be negatively influenced by the introduction of genes of stocked fish. Moreover, parasites and diseases can be introduced by fish stocking. This could have ecological consequences as well as economic consequences for the angling clubs. Therefore the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection pointed out in a strategic paper in 2007 that research into fish stocking and an optimization of this practice are urgently needed. (Please visit www.bmelv.de to find the strategic paper „Agrobiodiversität erhalten, Potenziale der Land-, Forst- und Fischereiwirtschaft erschließen und nachhaltig nutzen“.) The lack of objective ecological and economical evaluation as well as incomplete and emotionally-fuelled perceptions about the risks of stocking can fuel conflicts between several interest groups. For example there exist well documented controversies between environmental associations and fisheries. Both have published contrary reports about the effects and benefits of fish stocking. Additionally there is a lack of cooperation between scientists and local angling clubs. Scientific knowledge and practitioner knowledge regarding water body management is not integrated.
An objective evaluation of fish stocking is necessary for several reasons. First of all to minimize ecological risks, secondly to optimize the costs-benefits-relationship for angling clubs, thirdly to bring a more objective view to the controversies surrounding fish stocking, and finally to increase the acceptance of the angling clubs efforts in the society. For these reasons a cooperative research project, that combines scientific and practitioner perspectives and that integrates the specific local, ecological and economic circumstances is needed.
|